<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel><title>Michael Lockyear Blog - Soapbox</title><link>http://www.michaellockyear.com/blog/soapbox</link><description>Michael Lockyear's comments on other sites</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2010 Michael Lockyear. All rights reserved.</copyright><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:55:00 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><generator>Lockyear RSS feed generator v1</generator><managingEditor>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</managingEditor><webMaster>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</webMaster><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/MikesSoapbox" /><feedburner:info uri="mikessoapbox" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>MikesSoapbox</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item><title>Zuckerberg: “Guess What? Nobody Wants To Make Lists.”</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/KA7KQeOZheg/zuckerberg-guess-what-nobody-wants-to-make-lists</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you don't want friends and colleagues knowing that you are a secret leather fetishist (or whatever) at night, you should probably set-up an entirely separate profile...no risk of accidentally clicking the wrong box, or sharing with the wrong list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/KA7KQeOZheg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/zuckerberg-guess-what-nobody-wants-to-make-lists</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/zuckerberg-guess-what-nobody-wants-to-make-lists</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Why I Turned In My iPhone and Went Android</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/cHykUzoN1L4/why-i-turned-in-my-iphone-and-went-android</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One day every phone phone will be a smart phone, and the majority will run free and open source operating systems like Android.  The only way Apple can compete in the long run is to open source their mobile OS and push i-tunes, app store and whatever other cloud offerings they can come up with.  (The same might apply to Microsoft on mobile devices)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/cHykUzoN1L4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/why-i-turned-in-my-iphone-and-went-android</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/why-i-turned-in-my-iphone-and-went-android</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Twitter Death Sentence</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/mjMMdug6yKY/the-twitter-death-sentence</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Treating customers badly is not generally a good idea...but...when you use a free service (like Twitter or Facebook) you are not a customer.  The people who pay for the advertising are the customers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/mjMMdug6yKY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/the-twitter-death-sentence</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/the-twitter-death-sentence</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Pakistan Court Orders Temporary Facebook Ban Over Prophet Caricatures</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/YbsswU9vlaY/pakistan-court-orders-temporary-facebook-ban-over-prophet-caricatures1</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Somebody didn't "just one day" decide to "have a competition to draw blasphemous cartoons"...this was done in response to the censorship of South Park after the creators were warned that they were being "stupid" and would probably be killed if they aired the show.  They were told, "...This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/YbsswU9vlaY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/pakistan-court-orders-temporary-facebook-ban-over-prophet-caricatures1</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/pakistan-court-orders-temporary-facebook-ban-over-prophet-caricatures1</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Pakistan Court Orders Temporary Facebook Ban Over Prophet Caricatures</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/8WNsxhOnEeE/pakistan-court-orders-temporary-facebook-ban-over-prophet-caricatures</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the reason the competition started in the first place was because of Jihadist death threats made against the creators of South Park, which resulted in the censorship of that show.     The denizens of the internet will not tolerate censorship.  The more you complain the more you will be ridiculed (or drawn)!  Welcome to the internet and the Streisand Effect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/8WNsxhOnEeE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/pakistan-court-orders-temporary-facebook-ban-over-prophet-caricatures</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/pakistan-court-orders-temporary-facebook-ban-over-prophet-caricatures</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Privacy Reboot Needed</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/lvQmV_xRsyc/privacy-reboot-needed</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The lack of privacy, or the risk that privacy will evaporate, will simply change the way we use tools like Facebook.  We will use other tools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/lvQmV_xRsyc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 07:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/privacy-reboot-needed</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/privacy-reboot-needed</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Best Bookmark Management Tool? [Hive Five Call For Contenders]</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/TWbjaYfKdU0/best-bookmark-management-tool-hive-five-call-for-contenders</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VOTE: Delicious&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/TWbjaYfKdU0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/best-bookmark-management-tool-hive-five-call-for-contenders</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/best-bookmark-management-tool-hive-five-call-for-contenders</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Google Buys BumpTop: 3-D Multi-touch Tablet Interface on the Way?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/74tGLdPpp9Q/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way2</link><description>&lt;p&gt;…and the Apple iPhone made it debut on 29 / 30 June 2007.  This might give Google some multi-touch juice.

Google should start chatting to Logitech, who hold an interesting touchpad patent filed in 1996 (patent #5,825,352)

Personally I think the idea that a company can own a patent on finger movements a bit pathetic!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/74tGLdPpp9Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 13:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way2</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way2</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Google Buys BumpTop: 3-D Multi-touch Tablet Interface on the Way?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/nzYfkYjQOQM/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way3</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...and the Apple iPhone made it debut on 29 / 30 June 2007.  This might give Google some multi-touch juice.

Google should start chatting to Logitech, who hold an interesting touchpad patent filed in 1996 (patent #5,825,352)

Personally I think the idea that a company can own a patent on finger movements a bit pathetic!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/nzYfkYjQOQM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 13:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way3</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Google Buys BumpTop: 3-D Multi-touch Tablet Interface on the Way?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/HQYRIp-ilJo/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if BumpTop have any patents, or if they can demonstrate “prior use” re: Apple patents.  If so, may be useful to Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/HQYRIp-ilJo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Google Buys BumpTop: 3-D Multi-touch Tablet Interface on the Way?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/zPeKgVFvLis/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way1</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if BumpTop have any patents, or if they can demonstrate "prior use" re: Apple patents.  If so, may be useful to Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/zPeKgVFvLis" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way1</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/google-buys-bumptop-3-d-multi-touch-tablet-interface-on-the-way1</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Judge Won't Dismiss Antitrust Charges Against Microsoft For Breaking 3rd Party Xbox Memory Cards</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/AN6p-Pu166Q/judge-won-t-dismiss-antitrust-charges-against-microsoft-for-breaking-3rd-party-xbox-memory-cards1</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vote  with  your  wallet.    If  someone  sells  you  a  product  that  is  defective  by  design,  return  it.    If  someone  sells  you  a  product  and  then  yanks  functionality  with  a  firmware  "upgrade",  return  it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/AN6p-Pu166Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 08:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/judge-won-t-dismiss-antitrust-charges-against-microsoft-for-breaking-3rd-party-xbox-memory-cards1</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/judge-won-t-dismiss-antitrust-charges-against-microsoft-for-breaking-3rd-party-xbox-memory-cards1</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Posterous Starts Automatically Inserting Affiliate Links Into Sites, Forgets To Tell Users</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/Au-WEb0sxDI/posterous-starts-automatically-inserting-affiliate-links-into-sites-forgets-to-tell-users1</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone has to pay for "free"! 

If this approach is adopted fully, bloggers are going to need some serious disclosure statements to comply with the FTC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/Au-WEb0sxDI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/posterous-starts-automatically-inserting-affiliate-links-into-sites-forgets-to-tell-users1</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/posterous-starts-automatically-inserting-affiliate-links-into-sites-forgets-to-tell-users1</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Posterous Starts Automatically Inserting Affiliate Links Into Sites, Forgets To Tell Users</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/nGK0AtO0JR0/posterous-starts-automatically-inserting-affiliate-links-into-sites-forgets-to-tell-users</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone has to pay for "free"!If this approach is adopted fully, bloggers are going to need some serious disclosure statements to comply with the FTC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/nGK0AtO0JR0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 08:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/posterous-starts-automatically-inserting-affiliate-links-into-sites-forgets-to-tell-users</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/posterous-starts-automatically-inserting-affiliate-links-into-sites-forgets-to-tell-users</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Judge Won't Dismiss Antitrust Charges Against Microsoft For Breaking 3rd Party Xbox Memory Cards</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/QwCVyYPFDTQ/judge-won-t-dismiss-antitrust-charges-against-microsoft-for-breaking-3rd-party-xbox-memory-cards</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unless  the  consumer  is  prepared  to  stop  buying  products  from  companies  that  mess  them  around,  this  sort  of  thing  will  continue  to  happen.    The  courts  and  the  law  are  not  the  solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/QwCVyYPFDTQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 07:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/judge-won-t-dismiss-antitrust-charges-against-microsoft-for-breaking-3rd-party-xbox-memory-cards</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/judge-won-t-dismiss-antitrust-charges-against-microsoft-for-breaking-3rd-party-xbox-memory-cards</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Finally, A Definitive Answer On Whether Cell Phones Cause Cancer -- In 20 Or 30 Years</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/irTUt6MD8WU/finally-a-definitive-answer-on-whether-cell-phones-cause-cancer-in-20-or-30-years</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I  suspect  that  it  will  be  very  difficult  to  control  for  other  factors  which  may  give  rise  to  cancer:  diet,  environment,  etc.

Heavy  cell  phone  may  also  be  linked  to  factors  which  may  lead  to  cancer  (example:  stress),  so  it  will  be  interesting  to  see  how  they  separate  causation  from  correlation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/irTUt6MD8WU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/finally-a-definitive-answer-on-whether-cell-phones-cause-cancer-in-20-or-30-years</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/finally-a-definitive-answer-on-whether-cell-phones-cause-cancer-in-20-or-30-years</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How Engaging Is An Open Public Discussion If It Costs $20 To Enter?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/fLpOGrh9sOw/how-engaging-is-an-open-public-discussion-if-it-costs-20-to-enter</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This  is  a  non-starter  of  an  idea.    Not  enough  people  will  pay  for  the  site  for  it  to  be  a  "community".    I  would  be  surprised  /  impressed  if  they  are  able  to  get  people  to  use  the  site  for  free.

We  are  being  flooded  with  information,  and  have  limited  time  /  attention.    This  is  the  real  problem  that  the  news  media  face  -  they  are  selling  /  giving  away  generic  information  in  the  age  of  the  niche.    

If  the  news  industry  had  woken  up  10  years  ago  they  might  have  been  able  to  build  a  platform  like  Google,  but  they  missed  that  boat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/fLpOGrh9sOw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/how-engaging-is-an-open-public-discussion-if-it-costs-20-to-enter</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/how-engaging-is-an-open-public-discussion-if-it-costs-20-to-enter</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Rumor: Apple Thinking About Buying ARM. iPhone Rivals To Sleep With The Fishes?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/Q_DE_XSQGIE/rumor-apple-thinking-about-buying-arm-iphone-rivals-to-sleep-with-the-fishes</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eventually all phones are going to be smartphones, they will become cheaper and cheaper, and basically generic (much like the PC).  Nokia, or a some Chinese outfit could be a major player in such a market, but probably not Apple.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/Q_DE_XSQGIE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/rumor-apple-thinking-about-buying-arm-iphone-rivals-to-sleep-with-the-fishes</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/rumor-apple-thinking-about-buying-arm-iphone-rivals-to-sleep-with-the-fishes</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Economist On Why Copyright Needs To Return To Its Roots</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/7RxKscLa_WQ/the-economist-on-why-copyright-needs-to-return-to-its-roots</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The  life  expectancy  in  the  UK  300  years  ago  was  approximately  35  years.  [source:   http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/dg09102006.pdf  ]

This  meant  that  a  copyright  period  of  14  -  28  years  was  sufficient  to  cover  the  average  person's  lifespan  (assuming  people  did  not  write  books  before  the  age  of  7!).    One  could  therefore  argue  that  a  longer  period  might  be  justifiable.  

Personally,  I  do  not  think  that  a  reduced  copyright  period  of  14  -  28  years  would  stifle  commercial  creativity  in  any  way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/7RxKscLa_WQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/the-economist-on-why-copyright-needs-to-return-to-its-roots</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/the-economist-on-why-copyright-needs-to-return-to-its-roots</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How To Piss People Off: Publish A Book Using Their Tweets Without Asking Them First</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/eOiB6XOO1Dw/how-to-piss-people-off-publish-a-book-using-their-tweets-without-asking-them-first</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The  publishers  are  creating  a  bad  moral  precedent...we  should  not  (and  in  fact  do  not)  need  permission  to  quote  something  stated  in  public!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/eOiB6XOO1Dw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/how-to-piss-people-off-publish-a-book-using-their-tweets-without-asking-them-first</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/how-to-piss-people-off-publish-a-book-using-their-tweets-without-asking-them-first</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Eric Schmidt: Mobile Is The Future, And There’s No Such Thing As Communication Overload</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/dxgde71hPmE/eric-schmidt-mobile-is-the-future-and-there-s-no-such-thing-as-communication-overload</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe the US is less relevant than it thinks!  When everyone in the third world has a computer in their pocket the American masses will no longer be the masses.  When every phone is a smartphone, the brand will not really matter either. (I had look under desk to determine the brand of the PC I am using to type this comment).  If Nokia starts churning out cheap Android phones they will be fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/dxgde71hPmE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/eric-schmidt-mobile-is-the-future-and-there-s-no-such-thing-as-communication-overload</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/eric-schmidt-mobile-is-the-future-and-there-s-no-such-thing-as-communication-overload</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Economist Assumes That The Problem Is 'Thieves' Rather Than Bad Patent Laws</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/qg5Isdp5D1E/economist-assumes-that-the-problem-is-thieves-rather-than-bad-patent-laws</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I  suspect  because  they  generate  comments!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/qg5Isdp5D1E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/economist-assumes-that-the-problem-is-thieves-rather-than-bad-patent-laws</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/economist-assumes-that-the-problem-is-thieves-rather-than-bad-patent-laws</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Another Example of why Social E-Commerce is Awesome</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/MrRI6pyUXvI/another-example-of-why-social-e-commerce-is-awesome</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For the goldfish it must be like living at the graveyard!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/MrRI6pyUXvI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/another-example-of-why-social-e-commerce-is-awesome</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/another-example-of-why-social-e-commerce-is-awesome</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Is 2011 like 1994 for Apple, Twitter, Facebook, and the Web?</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/sL8nyzOKtwY/is-2011-like-1994-for-apple-twitter-facebook-and-the-web</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple's days are numbered.  One of these days every phone will be a smartphone, and they will NOT be Apples.   They will probably be running Android (as will your TV, GPS, etc) and while it is possible that no single device will have the market share that Apple has, collectively they will out-number Apple by a large margin.   Already in some markets (USA?) the number of Android phones is approaching the number of iPhones.  

As for "Apps",  the only native App I want to have to use is the browser, everything else should be in the cloud, accessible from any dumb device with a screen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/sL8nyzOKtwY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/is-2011-like-1994-for-apple-twitter-facebook-and-the-web</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/is-2011-like-1994-for-apple-twitter-facebook-and-the-web</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>MLB Comes Out Swinging With MLB.TV,  Yet The NFL Won’t Spend $3K on NFL.TV</title><link>http://feeds.michaellockyear.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~3/qNow1YFsdhU/mlb-comes-out-swinging-with-mlb-tv-yet-the-nfl-won-t-spend-3k-on-nfl-tv</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The concept of “premium names” seems to be a bit of a scam.  I am not surprised that companies are avoiding them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MikesSoapbox/~4/qNow1YFsdhU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><author>mikeblogs@michaellockyear.com (Michael Lockyear)</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/mlb-comes-out-swinging-with-mlb-tv-yet-the-nfl-won-t-spend-3k-on-nfl-tv</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.michaellockyear.com/page/mlb-comes-out-swinging-with-mlb-tv-yet-the-nfl-won-t-spend-3k-on-nfl-tv</feedburner:origLink></item></channel>
 </rss>
